↓ Skip to main content

Human Exposure to Early Morning Anopheles funestus Biting Behavior and Personal Protection Provided by Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Exposure to Early Morning Anopheles funestus Biting Behavior and Personal Protection Provided by Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Moiroux, Georgia B. Damien, Marc Egrot, Armel Djenontin, Fabrice Chandre, Vincent Corbel, Gerry F. Killeen, Cédric Pennetier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 148 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 46 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 11%
Environmental Science 11 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 53 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,004,080
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#49,319
of 203,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,922
of 233,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#994
of 4,710 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,710 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.