↓ Skip to main content

Human Exposure to Early Morning Anopheles funestus Biting Behavior and Personal Protection Provided by Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Exposure to Early Morning Anopheles funestus Biting Behavior and Personal Protection Provided by Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Moiroux, Georgia B. Damien, Marc Egrot, Armel Djenontin, Fabrice Chandre, Vincent Corbel, Gerry F. Killeen, Cédric Pennetier

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 13%
Environmental Science 10 9%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 30 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#5,288,193
of 16,570,575 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#61,661
of 160,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,218
of 283,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,284
of 2,768 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,570,575 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,768 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.