↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Hammerhead Ribozymes in All Domains of Life Reveals Novel Structural Variations

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Hammerhead Ribozymes in All Domains of Life Reveals Novel Structural Variations
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Perreault, Zasha Weinberg, Adam Roth, Olivia Popescu, Pascal Chartrand, Gerardo Ferbeyre, Ronald R. Breaker

Abstract

Hammerhead ribozymes are small self-cleaving RNAs that promote strand scission by internal phosphoester transfer. Comparative sequence analysis was used to identify numerous additional representatives of this ribozyme class than were previously known, including the first representatives in fungi and archaea. Moreover, we have uncovered the first natural examples of "type II" hammerheads, and our findings reveal that this permuted form occurs in bacteria as frequently as type I and III architectures. We also identified a commonly occurring pseudoknot that forms a tertiary interaction critical for high-speed ribozyme activity. Genomic contexts of many hammerhead ribozymes indicate that they perform biological functions different from their known role in generating unit-length RNA transcripts of multimeric viroid and satellite virus genomes. In rare instances, nucleotide variation occurs at positions within the catalytic core that are otherwise strictly conserved, suggesting that core mutations are occasionally tolerated or preferred.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
France 2 1%
Russia 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 136 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 33%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Professor 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 16 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 21%
Chemistry 17 12%
Computer Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 18 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,637
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,541
of 122,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#28
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.