↓ Skip to main content

Warm Arctic episodes linked with increased frequency of extreme winter weather in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
339 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Warm Arctic episodes linked with increased frequency of extreme winter weather in the United States
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-02992-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judah Cohen, Karl Pfeiffer, Jennifer A. Francis

Abstract

Recent boreal winters have exhibited a large-scale seesaw temperature pattern characterized by an unusually warm Arctic and cold continents. Whether there is any physical link between Arctic variability and Northern Hemisphere (NH) extreme weather is an active area of research. Using a recently developed index of severe winter weather, we show that the occurrence of severe winter weather in the United States is significantly related to anomalies in pan-Arctic geopotential heights and temperatures. As the Arctic transitions from a relatively cold state to a warmer one, the frequency of severe winter weather in mid-latitudes increases through the transition. However, this relationship is strongest in the eastern US and mixed to even opposite along the western US. We also show that during mid-winter to late-winter of recent decades, when the Arctic warming trend is greatest and extends into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, severe winter weather-including both cold spells and heavy snows-became more frequent in the eastern United States.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,044 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 339 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 20%
Researcher 62 18%
Student > Master 33 10%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 81 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 106 31%
Environmental Science 46 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 7%
Engineering 13 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 103 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2209. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,907
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#69
of 58,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50
of 352,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#2
of 1,225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.