↓ Skip to main content

言語の機能と構造と類型

Overview of attention for article published in GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
言語の機能と構造と類型
Published in
GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), October 2007
DOI 10.11435/gengo1939.1997.112_1
Authors

柴谷 方良

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,831,200
of 26,369,011 outputs
Outputs from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#54
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,519
of 91,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,369,011 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.