↓ Skip to main content

Operational tracking of lava lake surface motion at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Operational tracking of lava lake surface motion at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/tm13a3
Authors

Patrick, Matthew R., Orr, Tim R.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,218,624
of 12,695,728 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#173
of 1,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,989
of 273,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#16
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,695,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.