↓ Skip to main content

Quadricuspid Aortic Valve: A Comprehensive Review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quadricuspid Aortic Valve: A Comprehensive Review
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2016
DOI 10.5935/1678-9741.20160090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shi-Min Yuan

Abstract

Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital heart disease. The functional status of QAV is predominantly a pure aortic regurgitation. Clinical manifestations of patients with a QAV depend on the functional status of the QAV and the associated disorders. Significant valvular regurgitation and (or) stenosis is often present with subsequent operation performed at the fifth to sixth decade of life. The functional status of QAV is predominantly regurgitant; whereas pure stenotic QAV can be as few as in only 0.7% of the patients. QAV is usually an isolated anomaly, but other congenital heart defects can be present in 18-32% of the patients. About one-fifth of them require a surgical operation. Tricuspidalization is a preferred technique for QAV repair. As not all the patients with a QAV necessarily warrant a surgical operation, decision-making in patient selection and surgical procedure of choice are crucial. Antibiotic prophylaxis against infective endocarditis is necessary in the QAV patients with unequal-sized cusps.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 53%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,844,791
of 21,360,625 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,027
of 297,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,360,625 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them