↓ Skip to main content

Adamantinoma: A clinicopathological review and update

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adamantinoma: A clinicopathological review and update
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-3-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepali Jain, Vijay K Jain, Rakesh K Vasishta, Prabhat Ranjan, Yashwant Kumar

Abstract

Adamantinoma is a primary low-grade, malignant bone tumor that is predominantly located in the mid-portion of the tibia. The etiology of the tumor is still a matter of debate. The initial symptoms of adamantinoma are often indolent and nonspecific and depend on location and extent of the disease. Histologically, classic adamantinoma is a biphasic tumor characterized by epithelial and osteofibrous components that may be intermingled with each other in various proportions and differentiating patterns. To assure the histological diagnosis, pathologists should employ immunohistochemistry for demonstrating the sometimes sparse epithelial cell nests when the radiological features are suggestive of adamantinoma. There is paucity of compiled data over adamantinoma in the literature, hence authors tried to make a comprehensive review which must be of use to beginners and trained pathologists. Our objective is to further define the clinicoradiologic features and pathologic spectra of adamantinoma.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 15 28%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2017.
All research outputs
#4,675,530
of 15,021,881 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#141
of 900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,261
of 285,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,021,881 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 900 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.