↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Gene Regulatory Networks in the Mammalian Circadian Rhythm

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Gene Regulatory Networks in the Mammalian Circadian Rhythm
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Yan, Haifang Wang, Yuting Liu, Chunxuan Shao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 308 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 24%
Researcher 73 22%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Master 27 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 5%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 45 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 7%
Neuroscience 18 5%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 56 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,639
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,261
of 103,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#27
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.