↓ Skip to main content

Eruptive history and geochronology of the Mount Baker volcanic field, Washington

Overview of attention for article published in Geological Society of America Bulletin, June 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eruptive history and geochronology of the Mount Baker volcanic field, Washington
Published in
Geological Society of America Bulletin, June 2003
DOI 10.1130/0016-7606(2003)115<0729:ehagot>2.0.co;2
Authors

Wes Hildreth, Judy Fierstein, Marvin Lanphere

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 59 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 22%
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 6 10%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 73%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Design 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#1,094
of 2,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,739
of 50,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.