↓ Skip to main content

Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012186
Authors

Irene Tramacere, Maria Donata Benedetti, Matteo Capobussi, Greta Castellini, Antonietta Citterio, Cinzia Del Giovane, Serena Frau, Marien Gonzalez-Lorenzo, Loredana La Mantia, Lorenzo Moja, Sara Nuzzo, Graziella Filippini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,635,185
of 12,662,564 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,527
of 10,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,275
of 274,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#176
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,662,564 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.