↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of obstetric complications and uterine connective tissue in tenascin-X-deficient humans and mice

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of obstetric complications and uterine connective tissue in tenascin-X-deficient humans and mice
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00441-008-0591-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David F. Egging, Ivonne van Vlijmen-Willems, Jiwon Choi, Anita C. T. M. Peeters, Desiree van Rens, Guido Veit, Manuel Koch, Elaine C. Davis, Joost Schalkwijk

Abstract

Tenascin-X (TNX) is a large, multi-domain, extracellular matrix glycoprotein. Complete deficiency of TNX in humans leads to a recessive form of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), and TNX haploinsufficiency is a cause of hypermobility type EDS. EDS patients appear to have a higher risk of several complications during pregnancy, such as pelvic instability, premature rupture of membranes, and postpartum hemorrhage. Here, we present a study of genitourinary and obstetric complications in TNX-deficient women of reproductive age. We have found complications, such as uterus prolapses, that are in agreement with previous findings in other EDS types. In TNX knockout (KO) mice, we have observed mild pregnancy-related abnormalities. Morphological and immunohistological analysis of uterine tissues has not revealed obvious quantitative or spatial differences between TNX KO and wildtype mice with respect to collagen types I, III, V, and XII or elastic fibers. We conclude that TNX-deficient women are at risk of obstetric complications, but that TNX KO mice show only a mild phenotype. Furthermore, we show that TNX is involved in the stability of elastic fibers rather than in their initial deposition.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Ireland 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#527
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,178
of 81,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.