↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
16 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000184.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Cluver, Gillian ML Gyte, Marlene Sinclair, Therese Dowswell, G Justus Hofmeyr

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 142 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Unspecified 19 13%
Researcher 19 13%
Other 16 11%
Other 46 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 19%
Unspecified 25 17%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 15 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#570,935
of 13,292,231 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,846
of 10,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,895
of 277,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,292,231 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.