NO evidence that dieting to lower cholesterol reduces mortality @DrMichaelMosley http://t.co/136DaMK0ex @ProfTimNoakes #trustmeimadoctor
@JezzaHunt @ProfTimNoakes @HELPdietSA http://t.co/ikUhoDftKu Guidelines helped ;)
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines http://t.co/gmq4SrnHVx
@TrueTechLover Sure it’s nothing to do with unscientific UK dietary advice since 1977 to avoid fat? http://t.co/gMOAg2eICv
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support US & UK dietary fat guidelines: Open Heart 2(1): http://t.co/kKQvzwbkGl
See for yourself http://t.co/H26MhJbxTM
Interested in learning more about the science behind guidelines. Check these out...https://t.co/QIA0HxNioU http://t.co/trkOpg7KZU
Low fat diet fails. But, hindsight is always twenty-twenty. http://t.co/PIqf7W4STb
Dietary recommendations were introduced for millions of US&UK citizens by 1983 without supporting evidence from RCTs http://t.co/Pwy1lsB5oS
Meta-analyse cholesterolrichtlijnen 2015: http://t.co/E3jZbGNzuO
@PaulHawkins66 Opinions pointless. I’ve found no research to support NHS dietary advice & plenty of adv effects: http://t.co/xqfkgYuc8h
@faye_harrison @yoguruso @AlastairMcA30 @drgail3 Current dietary guidelines: fatal flaws http://t.co/Gmmp4f2QYj http://t.co/f8EKWBwPhU
@AlastairMcA30 @drgail3 LCHF has long history of safe use, unlike current dietary guidelines http://t.co/Gmmp4f2QYj http://t.co/f8EKWBwPhU
"Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977/1983" http://t.co/E7WVoHriTZ
Fat diet guidelines- are they evidence based? http://t.co/Lq8btUTIMa
UK and US dietary guidelines on fat consumption should never have been introduced concludes new research - http://t.co/LQ5V4vOPv3
The low fat diet has been the largest human experiment http://t.co/7Sxvb8ny2g
You might be surprised there was no evidence for the US & UK adoption of low fat dietary guidelines in the 1970s http://t.co/ozw303Ncuo
You might be surprised there was no evidence for the US & UK adoption of low fat dietary guidelines in the 1970s http://t.co/ozw303Ncuo
Trans fats - not saturated fats - are the real enemy & #palmoil is a widely available replacement, free of trans fats http://t.co/Qm4Wfs4I45
Trans fats - not saturated fats - are the real enemy & #palmoil is a widely available replacement, free of trans fats http://t.co/Qm4Wfs4I45
.@MarisolTouraine Scientifiques anglais: Les reccomendations sur gras saturés n'auraient jamais du être introduites http://t.co/KUN2h81bB9
.@Maggiedeblock Scientifiques anglais: Les reccomendations sur les gras saturés n'auraient jamais du être introduites http://t.co/KUN2h81bB9
Scientifiques anglais: "les conseils diététiques sur les gras saturés n’auraient jamais du être introduit" http://t.co/KUN2h81bB9
Nouvel étude @Open_HeartBMJ denonce les directives diététiques sur les gras saturés, fondées sur des preuves limitées http://t.co/KUN2h81bB9
Trans fats - not saturated fats - are the real enemy & #palmoil is a widely available replacement, free of trans fats http://t.co/Qm4Wfs4I45
Dietary guidelines on saturated fats are wrong and need to be changed, according to new scientific evidence http://t.co/Qm4Wfs4I45
.@MarisolTouraine UK scientists: Dietary advice on fats doesn't merely need review; it shouldn't have been introduced http://t.co/z9psyavMU6
.@maggiedeblock UK scientists: Dietary advice on fats doesn't merely need a review; it shouldn't have been introduced http://t.co/z9psyavMU6
.@Jeremy_Hunt UK scientists:Dietary advice on sat fats doesn't merely need a review;it shouldn't have been introduced http://t.co/z9psyavMU6
UK scientists argue, "dietary advice on sat fats does not merely need a review; it should not have been introduced" http://t.co/z9psyavMU6
New report in @Open_HeartBMJ argues that dietary guidelines on saturated fats are based on “very limited evidence” http://t.co/z9psyavMU6
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
Evidence did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a review and meta-analysis http://t.co/RAXVocoPCd
Evidence did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a review and meta-analysis http://t.co/RAXVocoPCd
Evidence did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a review and meta-analysis http://t.co/RAXVocoPCd
Evidence did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a review and meta-analysis http://t.co/RAXVocoPCd
Evidence did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983: a review and meta-analysis http://t.co/RAXVocoPCd
Meta-analysis: Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines http://t.co/aFoLQH1msy
Meta-analysis: Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines http://t.co/aFoLQH1msy
Anbyody surprised? Meta: Evidence ... did not support introduction of dietary fat guidelines in USA 1977 and UK 1983 http://t.co/SNNgW6fG4k
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines -meta-analysis: http://t.co/qdUb3kctIu
@HeartNews I know one thing: that I know nothing about fats: http://t.co/zuJ2Dy42wV
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines -meta-analysis: http://t.co/qdUb3kctIu
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines -meta-analysis: http://t.co/qdUb3kctIu
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines -meta-analysis: http://t.co/qdUb3kctIu
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines -meta-analysis: http://t.co/qdUb3kctIu
@MedscapeDE bezüglich Studie http://t.co/O5aec7Oe4H
Evidence from randomized controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 & 1983: http://t.co/Wcfs5ilgru
Dietary recommendations have been based on epidemiological data and not on RCT's. Is that the reason we get it wrong? http://t.co/BVtU9Awd4d
Dietary recommendations have been based on epidemiological data and not on RCT's. Is that the reason we get it wrong? http://t.co/BVtU9Awd4d
Astonishing but is today's data much better? | Dietary fat guidance in 1977 & 1983 not based on RCTs http://t.co/x6124HMC0f @ConscienHealth
Astonishing but is today's data much better? | Dietary fat guidance in 1977 & 1983 not based on RCTs http://t.co/x6124HMC0f @ConscienHealth
There was no statistically significant relationship between dietary interventions and heart deaths.http://t.co/5y5HlGEx94
no statistically significant relationship between dietary interventions and all-cause mortality.http://t.co/5y5HlGEx94
Meta-analysis shows low-fat guidelines not supported by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) #dontfearthefat #eatphi http://t.co/vXk7ccTOw7
Terrific meta-analysis by @zoeharcombe re: insanity of dietary fat guidelines.http://t.co/hto14PX836
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines http://t.co/5kh2kpVii6
@Duke_mochuck @MichaelH_PhD I disagree, but I'm willing to listen to ur argument for it BTW, have u read this? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
2015 #DGAC must have missed our meta-analysis http://t.co/cxvxLUUYxc why attack #saturated fat? Or #salt ? http://t.co/pT4bzlnaV0
2015 #DGAC must have missed our meta-analysis http://t.co/cxvxLUUYxc why attack #saturated fat? Or #salt ? http://t.co/pT4bzlnaV0
2015 #DGAC must have missed our meta-analysis http://t.co/cxvxLUUYxc why attack #saturated fat? Or #salt ? http://t.co/pT4bzlnaV0
Experts in nutrition and public health agree http://t.co/J7dq7EOVp4 on the Nutritionista saturated fat paper. Poor. http://t.co/MbMsDA6uku
RCTs did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 & 1983: systematic review and meta-analysis http://t.co/mYaky1xaBL
@Nana_Terracota De hecho, la comunidad científica dice lo contrario. Aquí dejo el estudio completo y corregido: http://t.co/FLzTPcMyq1
RCTs did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 & 1983: systematic review and meta-analysis http://t.co/tMjYkZkdOM
RCTs did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 & 1983: systematic review and meta-analysis http://t.co/tMjYkZkdOM
The low fat diet has been the largest human experiment http://t.co/7Sxvb8ny2g
.@VegetableManDan If we listened to #DGAC advice before, we'd all be dead http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Time to fire the parasitic control freaks
.@MidAmericanGuy @fbtalk #dgac wrong bout everything Fat http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Salt http://t.co/eX444IHozC Cholstrol http://t.co/PECyY9b6uX
Anbyody surprised? Meta: Evidence ... did not support introduction of dietary fat guidelines in USA 1977 and UK 1983 http://t.co/SNNgW6fG4k
#dgac wrong about Fat http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Salt http://t.co/eX444IHozC Cholesterol http://t.co/PECyY9b6uX Alcohol http://t.co/HuZbBeo4Hu
.@Doc4Heart everything #dgac ever recommended was wrong Fat http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Salt http://t.co/eX444IHozC Cholrl http://t.co/PECyY9b6uX
.@lfmsij everything #dgac ever recommended was wrong? Fat: http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Salt: http://t.co/eX444IHozC
@preventioninst how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
@andybellatti you can call that evidence-free self-serving curtain-twitching drivel anything but "scientific" http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
@MicheleRSimon how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
@PajamaDaze how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
@obesitydaily how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
@JacquesR @DrDavidKatz how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
.@katiecouric how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
.@PublicHealth how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
.@DrLeanneRedman how can you believe a word in #dgac report when everything they ever recommended was wrong? http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo
.@FoodGeekRoger #dgac couldn't model a line on mm paper http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Their advice is vacuous self-serving control freakery
.@Food_Dr #dgac 'experts' were never right http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo This time they're scraping the barrel to save their parasitic jobs
.@CSPI If we listened to #DGAC advice before we'd all be dead http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Time to fire the parasitic incompetent control freaks
Dogmatic stupidity from so-called "Public Health" almost killed us all once http://t.co/W1piSx89Eo Why would anyone listen to them anymore?
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 & 1983 http://t.co/okrObdz5hr
@IMLahart Confirmation bias runs just one way? What did you think of @zoeharcombe http://t.co/Ga82n14aPF ? http://t.co/JznzzsBbVH
Low fat mantra leading to a societal addiction to carbohydrates based on flawed research http://t.co/mfvLPOWgJO @zoeharcombe @JoannaBlythman
Low fat mantra leading to a societal addiction to carbohydrates based on flawed research http://t.co/mfvLPOWgJO @zoeharcombe @JoannaBlythman
Low fat mantra leading to a societal addiction to carbohydrates based on flawed research http://t.co/mfvLPOWgJO @zoeharcombe @JoannaBlythman
Well I take it @bengoldacre wasn't involved in review of @zoeharcombe's Open Heart article ;-) http://t.co/y6M1PVQdRV http://t.co/bzwBq3FUr2
Well I take it @bengoldacre wasn't involved in review of @zoeharcombe's Open Heart article ;-) http://t.co/y6M1PVQdRV http://t.co/bzwBq3FUr2
Well I take it @bengoldacre wasn't involved in review of @zoeharcombe's Open Heart article ;-) http://t.co/y6M1PVQdRV http://t.co/bzwBq3FUr2
Well I take it @bengoldacre wasn't involved in review of @zoeharcombe's Open Heart article ;-) http://t.co/y6M1PVQdRV http://t.co/bzwBq3FUr2
Well known to those of us who study nutrition, but not at all to general population...so sad http://t.co/OeIz0S4R3A
Study finds that US & UK dietary fat guidelines were introduced in 70s & 80s without supporting evidence http://t.co/B5eCORdCFR #openaccess