@zoeharcombe presenting RCT evidence for original dietary guidelines at their time of release #LCHF http://t.co/Fy29vobmNL
Fact checking fat recommendations http://t.co/bFqCz2AcWH good to know?
この論文はまた衝撃的な。。。 「RCTは食事介入療法を支持しない」 http://t.co/60nbZ6edWv
When people who work for a "nutraceutical company" tell you dietary guidelines on fat are wrong, it causes damage: http://t.co/oMEIT7RgXR
This is why conflicts of interest in systematic reviews matter: http://t.co/oMEIT7RgXR This article, w undisclosed COI, has altmetric = 615.
Historic US & UK dietary advice on fats 'should not have been introduced' http://t.co/zefo7ESPHq @Open_HeartBMJ http://t.co/jOTD3wRTvU
.@GHJournal All thanks to vacuous advice from "health" fundamentalists http://t.co/I4abDtwSnn More critical thinking, less puritan nannying!
Following the posts from my fellows regarding saturated fat and nutrition. http://t.co/Og1BSo7ThS
38yrs late...new research shows that 1st dietary guidelines rec for reduced fat were not based on supporting evidence http://t.co/Rtu7jcfXUV
If we listened to the "health" fundamentalists diet advice in the '80's we'd all be dead http://t.co/WgvdhWoxmk Time to defund these quacks
If we listened to the "health" fundamentalists diet advice in the '80's we'd all be dead http://t.co/WgvdhWoxmk Time to defund these quacks
Study finds that US & UK dietary fat guidelines were introduced in 70s & 80s without supporting evidence http://t.co/B5eCORdCFR #openaccess
Anbyody surprised? Meta: Evidence ... did not support introduction of dietary fat guidelines in USA 1977 and UK 1983 http://t.co/SNNgW6fG4k
Anbyody surprised? Meta: Evidence ... did not support introduction of dietary fat guidelines in USA 1977 and UK 1983 http://t.co/SNNgW6fG4k
Anbyody surprised? Meta: Evidence ... did not support introduction of dietary fat guidelines in USA 1977 and UK 1983 http://t.co/SNNgW6fG4k
A BMJ Open Heart article may have an undisclosed financial conflict of interest. The author is an associate editor. http://t.co/KUHX7Et2Hu
Dietary recs to reduce fat consumption were given without any supporting evidence or testing, new meta-analysis finds http://t.co/OXqgap6rK2
"Instead of arbitrarily focusing on limiting one macronutrient...simply "eat real food." http://t.co/k6sNDBTcmV http://t.co/buizBAtKpG
"Instead of arbitrarily focusing on limiting one macronutrient...simply "eat real food." http://t.co/k6sNDBTcmV http://t.co/buizBAtKpG
dietary advice not merely needs review; it should not have been introduced http://t.co/ihkLrozGn6 http://t.co/NDqb3FWJde
More #science to show no science behind official dietary guidelines doctors and #dietitians stuck to for 40 years: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
Open Heart | Mobile http://t.co/Uu6kAKQxSJ
#diet & #fat - Health & Fat http://t.co/5LZz3kFvv5
Evidence ... did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines [http://t.co/74egODDfzp] http://t.co/qUv2h2pHos
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
Historic US & UK dietary advice on fats 'should not have been introduced' http://t.co/zefo7ESPHq @Open_HeartBMJ http://t.co/jOTD3wRTvU
New study on healthy food http://t.co/Av2VfeL1iT contradicting recent paper? http://t.co/uTsxn11LjW Who is right now?
New study on healthy food http://t.co/Av2VfeL1iT contradicting recent paper? http://t.co/uTsxn11LjW Who is right now?
New study on healthy food http://t.co/Av2VfeL1iT contradicting recent paper? http://t.co/uTsxn11LjW Who is right now?
Hochkontrovers: neue Studie->Ernährung spiele doch wesentliche Rolle! Was stimmt nun? http://t.co/LiRSJGssmW oder http://t.co/O5aec7Oe4H
More #science to show no science behind official dietary guidelines doctors and #dietitians stuck to for 40 years: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
How to tell good scientists, doctors, dietitians from bad? When they're wrong, they say so and they say sorry: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
What was the evidence in 1977 when our govt first advised a diet low in fat and sat fat? Nada, says BMJ article: http://t.co/m1p6eIhdzM
sorry: http://t.co/Ju9hhdWpkX (2/2)
How to tell good scientists, doctors, dietitians from bad? When they're wrong, they say so and they say sorry: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
Eminence based medicine: dietary guidelines http://t.co/fy2tBIy4Kj @UTsandiego + http://t.co/FtfX5BXPso @bmj_latest http://t.co/P5FbQGyUD2
How to tell good scientists, doctors, dietitians from bad? When they're wrong, they say so and they say sorry: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
Oops. http://t.co/PKNo77NMk0
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
More #science to show no science behind official dietary guidelines doctors and #dietitians stuck to for 40 years: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
Eminence based medicine: dietary guidelines http://t.co/fy2tBIy4Kj @UTsandiego + http://t.co/FtfX5BXPso @bmj_latest http://t.co/P5FbQGyUD2
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
Eminence based medicine: dietary guidelines http://t.co/fy2tBIy4Kj @UTsandiego + http://t.co/FtfX5BXPso @bmj_latest http://t.co/P5FbQGyUD2
How to tell good scientists, doctors, dietitians from bad? When they're wrong, they say so and they say sorry: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
How to tell good scientists, doctors, dietitians from bad? When they're wrong, they say so and they say sorry: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
How to tell good scientists, doctors, dietitians from bad? When they're wrong, they say so and they say sorry: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
More #science to show no science behind official dietary guidelines doctors and #dietitians stuck to for 40 years: http://t.co/qgCcduW8DM
Eminence based medicine: dietary guidelines http://t.co/fy2tBIy4Kj @UTsandiego + http://t.co/FtfX5BXPso @bmj_latest http://t.co/P5FbQGyUD2
Do guidelines on fat need to change? Read our new study http://t.co/uY0654NeNc and the editorial http://t.co/40Q1EcZSMk What do you think?
Evidence that dietary fat intake has no bearing on changing blood cholesterol levels. http://t.co/CSOATe19h0
Las pruebas de ensayos controlados aleatorios no apoyan la introducción de directrices de grasa en la dieta, http://t.co/XyN408zcND
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines http://t.co/z2h8wk06D7
Evidence from randomised controlled trials Wonder how many deaths this mainstream advice has caused Canadians? http://t.co/Zn6ZYxCbGo
The low fat diet has been the largest human experiment http://t.co/7Sxvb8ny2g
Historic consensus guidelines didn't have RCT evidence http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY it's like finding bear toilets near lots of trees, non-news
"Dietary recommendations were introduced..., in the absence of supporting evidence from RCTs" http://t.co/ezyrLMZ76p
"Dietary recommendations were introduced..., in the absence of supporting evidence from RCTs" http://t.co/XCatKKjsKi
Evidence from randomised controlled trials did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines : a review http://t.co/HdteyjcTzn
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
#Dietary advice on #fat consumption issued in the US and UK more than 30 years ago should never have been introduced http://t.co/5IRMkmwDrF
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
“@JuanGrvas: ¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/TWn8N3achH”
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
Evidence did not support the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983- Systematic review and meta-anal http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
¿Dieta sin grasas para el colesterol alto? Sin fundamento científico. http://t.co/kwpEYsDG9V
I still find this so crazy, every time I read something about it! "Dietary recommendations were introduced for... http://t.co/C2J6VSPC6H
@EatNutritious what's wrong with turkey #fat? http://t.co/RpA0wO4avX #obesity #weight
Does your doctor/dietitian advise you according to current international guidelines? Oh dear! http://t.co/5xTjjsDuUm #LCHF #Banting
@gominolasdpetro Una nueva investigación http://t.co/p2RdBBKjW5
Avoiding saturated fat, NOT evidence based http://t.co/2bm7IrEnt6
Does your doctor/dietitian advise you according to current international guidelines? Oh dear! http://t.co/5xTjjsDuUm #LCHF #Banting
@dieticianSA you think dietitians have a monopoly on knowing what is scientific?Clearly they - and you - dont! http://t.co/5xTjjsDuUm
@dieticianSA I'm not here to win popularity contest. Check the science: http://t.co/5xTjjsDuUm
No evidence base for the 1980s low-fat dietary recommendations! Recent meta-analysis article in Open Heart journal: http://t.co/CxWUzvy05h
Better late than never. Some new papers about fat & cholesterol: 1)http://t.co/B7Nq2ttB7v 2)http://t.co/RbsecTYh7d 3)http://t.co/mVtarsoqF3
Better late than never. Some new papers about fat & cholesterol: 1)http://t.co/B7Nq2ttB7v 2)http://t.co/RbsecTYh7d 3)http://t.co/mVtarsoqF3
Today we've learnt about vanilla 'tax avoidance'. This week we've been surrounded by 'vanilla nutritional science'too http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY
Another study demonstrating that our dietary guidelines are based on little evidence! #lchf It's well and truly... http://t.co/kKW8BvzU4F
BMJ concluye que se recomendó reducir la grasa a 276 millones de personas sin evidencia de ensayos clínicos http://t.co/K3FVmmOCZb
Nice work @zoeharcombe Keeping the fat debate alive by challenging poorly evidenced current nutrition guidelines. http://t.co/egM6QDyFzh
Today we've learnt about vanilla 'tax avoidance'. This week we've been surrounded by 'vanilla nutritional science'too http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY
Today we've learnt about vanilla 'tax avoidance'. This week we've been surrounded by 'vanilla nutritional science'too http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY
Remember The NACNE Report? Now making fat headlines. http://t.co/z5fMor0xlk
Today we've learnt about vanilla 'tax avoidance'. This week we've been surrounded by 'vanilla nutritional science'too http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY
I love this example of non evidence based policy. Looks like made up as you go along. http://t.co/TbxfTfGkko
!! There was no scientific evidence for the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and 1983. http://t.co/6PIbmndJqv
Today we've learnt about vanilla 'tax avoidance'. This week we've been surrounded by 'vanilla nutritional science'too http://t.co/MKkZKHhVOY
Better late than never. Some new papers about fat & cholesterol: 1)http://t.co/B7Nq2ttB7v 2)http://t.co/RbsecTYh7d 3)http://t.co/mVtarsoqF3