↓ Skip to main content

Seed dispersal by wind, birds, and bats between Philippine montane rainforest and successional vegetation

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seed dispersal by wind, birds, and bats between Philippine montane rainforest and successional vegetation
Published in
Oecologia, November 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00442-002-1081-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina R. Ingle

Abstract

In the moist Neotropics, vertebrate frugivores have a much greater role in the dispersal of forest and successional woody plants than wind, and bats rather than birds play the dominant role in dispersing early successional species. I investigated whether these patterns also occurred in a Philippine montane rainforest and adjacent successional vegetation. I also asked whether seed mass was related to probability of dispersal between habitats. A greater number of woody species and stems in the forest produced vertebrate-dispersed seeds than wind-dispersed seeds. Although input of forest seeds into the successional area was dominated by vertebrate-dispersed seeds in terms of species richness, wind-dispersed seeds landed in densities 15 times higher. Frugivorous birds dispersed more forest seeds and species into the successional area than bats, and more successional seeds and species into the forest. As expected, seed input declined with distance from source habitat. Low input of forest seeds into the successional area at the farthest distance sampled, 40 m from forest edge, particularly for vertebrate-dispersed seeds, suggests very limited dispersal out of forest even into a habitat in which woody successional vegetation provides perches and fruit resources. For species of vertebrate-dispersed successional seeds, probability of dispersal into forest declined significantly with seed mass.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 3%
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 331 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 84 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 17%
Student > Master 66 17%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Postgraduate 23 6%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 31 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 241 64%
Environmental Science 81 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 37 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,168,931
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#293
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,389
of 135,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.