You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating the Relevance of World Disturbances to Explain Savings, Interference and Long-Term Motor Adaptation Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002210 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Max Berniker, Konrad P. Kording |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 39% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 31 | 26% |
| Engineering | 25 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 14% |
| Psychology | 14 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#20,817,194
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,249
of 9,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,551
of 146,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#109
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.