You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dopaminergic Neuronal Loss, Reduced Neurite Complexity and Autophagic Abnormalities in Transgenic Mice Expressing G2019S Mutant LRRK2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018568 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Ramonet, João Paulo L. Daher, Brian M. Lin, Klodjan Stafa, Jaekwang Kim, Rebecca Banerjee, Marie Westerlund, Olga Pletnikova, Liliane Glauser, Lichuan Yang, Ying Liu, Deborah A. Swing, M. Flint Beal, Juan C. Troncoso, J. Michael McCaffery, Nancy A. Jenkins, Neal G. Copeland, Dagmar Galter, Bobby Thomas, Michael K. Lee, Ted M. Dawson, Valina L. Dawson, Darren J. Moore |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 305 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 23% |
| Researcher | 59 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 69 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 65 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#118,148
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,160
of 124,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#769
of 1,514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.