↓ Skip to main content

A robust internal control for high-precision DNA methylation analyses by droplet digital PCR

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A robust internal control for high-precision DNA methylation analyses by droplet digital PCR
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13148-018-0456-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi D. Pharo, Kim Andresen, Kaja C. G. Berg, Ragnhild A. Lothe, Marine Jeanmougin, Guro E. Lind

Abstract

Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) allows absolute quantification of nucleic acids and has potential for improved non-invasive detection of DNA methylation. For increased precision of the methylation analysis, we aimed to develop a robust internal control for use in methylation-specific ddPCR. Two control design approaches were tested: (a) targeting a genomic region shared across members of a gene family and (b) combining multiple assays targeting different pericentromeric loci on different chromosomes. Through analyses of 34 colorectal cancer cell lines, the performance of the control assay candidates was optimized and evaluated, both individually and in various combinations, using the QX200™ droplet digital PCR platform (Bio-Rad). The best-performing control was tested in combination with assays targeting methylatedCDO1,SEPT9, andVIM. A 4Plex panel consisting ofEPHA3,KBTBD4,PLEKHF1, andSYT10was identified as the best-performing control. The use of the 4Plex for normalization reduced the variability in methylation values, corrected for differences in template amount, and diminished the effect of chromosomal aberrations. Positive Droplet Calling (PoDCall), an R-based algorithm for standardized threshold determination, was developed, ensuring consistency of the ddPCR results. Implementation of a robust internal control, i.e., the 4Plex, and an algorithm for automated threshold determination, PoDCall, in methylation-specific ddPCR increase the precision of DNA methylation analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 22 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,237,021
of 24,413,320 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#235
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,332
of 335,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,413,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.