↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in DYRK1A Associated with Replication of HIV-1 in Monocyte-Derived Macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in DYRK1A Associated with Replication of HIV-1 in Monocyte-Derived Macrophages
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastiaan M. Bol, Perry D. Moerland, Sophie Limou, Yvonne van Remmerden, Cédric Coulonges, Daniëlle van Manen, Joshua T. Herbeck, Jacques Fellay, Margit Sieberer, Jantine G. Sietzema, Ruben van 't Slot, Jeremy Martinson, Jean-François Zagury, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Angélique B. van 't Wout

Abstract

HIV-1 infected macrophages play an important role in rendering resting T cells permissive for infection, in spreading HIV-1 to T cells, and in the pathogenesis of AIDS dementia. During highly active anti-retroviral treatment (HAART), macrophages keep producing virus because tissue penetration of antiretrovirals is suboptimal and the efficacy of some is reduced. Thus, to cure HIV-1 infection with antiretrovirals we will also need to efficiently inhibit viral replication in macrophages. The majority of the current drugs block the action of viral enzymes, whereas there is an abundance of yet unidentified host factors that could be targeted. We here present results from a genome-wide association study identifying novel genetic polymorphisms that affect in vitro HIV-1 replication in macrophages.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2011.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,762
of 194,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,532
of 106,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#665
of 1,331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.