↓ Skip to main content

Onsite training of doctors, midwives and nurses in obstetric emergencies, Zimbabwe

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Onsite training of doctors, midwives and nurses in obstetric emergencies, Zimbabwe
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, March 2015
DOI 10.2471/blt.14.145532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna F Crofts, Teclar Mukuli, Bobb T Murove, Solwayo Ngwenya, Sma Mhlanga, Meluleki Dube, Elton Sengurayi, Cathy Winter, Sharon Jordan, Sonia Barnfield, Heather Wilcox, Abi Merriel, Sabelo Ndlovu, Zedekiah Sibanda, Sikangezile Moyo, Wedu Ndebele, Tim J Draycott, Thabani Sibanda

Abstract

In Zimbabwe, many health facilities are not able to manage serious obstetric complications. Staff most commonly identified inadequate training as the greatest barrier to preventing avoidable maternal deaths. We established an onsite obstetric emergencies training programme for maternity staff in the Mpilo Central Hospital. We trained 12 local staff to become trainers and provided them with the equipment and resources needed for the course. The trainers held one-day courses for 299 staff at the hospital. Maternal mortality in Zimbabwe has increased from 555 to 960 per 100 000 pregnant women from 2006 to 2011 and 47% of the deaths are believed to be avoidable. Most obstetric emergencies trainings are held off-site, away from the clinical area, for a limited number of staff. Following an in-hospital train-the-trainers course, 90% (138/153) of maternity staff were trained locally within the first year, with 299 hospital staff trained to date. Local system changes included: the introduction of a labour ward board, emergency boxes, colour-coded early warning observation charts and a maternity dashboard. In this hospital, these changes have been associated with a 34% reduction in hospital maternal mortality from 67 maternal deaths per 9078 births (0.74%) in 2011 compared with 48 maternal deaths per 9884 births (0.49%) in 2014. Introducing obstetric emergencies training and tools was feasible onsite, improved clinical practice, was sustained by local staff and associated with improved clinical outcomes. Further work to study the implementation and effect of this intervention at scale is required.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 9 5%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 50 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 22%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Psychology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#83
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,944
of 279,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.