You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is fairness intuitive? An experiment accounting for subjective utility differences under time pressure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Economics, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10683-018-9566-3 |
| Authors |
Anna Louisa Merkel, Johannes Lohse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 19% |
| Psychology | 8 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,372,100
of 24,579,513 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Economics
#83
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,943
of 336,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Economics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.