The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Rab coupling protein is selectively degraded by calpain in a Ca2+-dependent manner
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biochemical Journal, June 2005
|
DOI | 10.1042/bj20042116 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicolas MARIE, Andrew J. LINDSAY, Mary W. McCAFFREY |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 44% |
Researcher | 6 | 33% |
Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 61% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,696,560
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Biochemical Journal
#1,347
of 11,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,360
of 56,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemical Journal
#11
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.