↓ Skip to main content

Plant Viral Vectors

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 240: Emerging Antibody-based Products
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Emerging Antibody-based Products
Chapter number 240
Book title
Plant Viral Vectors
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/82_2012_240
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-240828-1, 978-3-64-240829-8
Authors

Kevin J. Whaley, Josh Morton, Steve Hume, Ernie Hiatt, Barry Bratcher, Victor Klimyuk, Andrew Hiatt, Michael Pauly, Larry Zeitlin, Whaley, Kevin J., Morton, Josh, Hume, Steve, Hiatt, Ernie, Bratcher, Barry, Klimyuk, Victor, Hiatt, Andrew, Pauly, Michael, Zeitlin, Larry

Abstract

Antibody-based products are not widely available to address many global health challenges due to high costs, limited manufacturing capacity, and long manufacturing lead times. There are now tremendous opportunities to address these industrialization challenges as a result of revolutionary advances in plant virus-based transient expression. This review focuses on some antibody-based products that are in preclinical and clinical development, and have scaled up manufacturing and purification (mg of purified mAb/kg of biomass). Plant virus-based antibody products provide lower upfront cost, shorter time to clinical and market supply, and lower cost of goods (COGs). Further, some plant virus-based mAbs may provide improvements in pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Master 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Chemical Engineering 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,933,363
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#77
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,912
of 164,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.