↓ Skip to main content

RodZ modulates geometric localization of the bacterial actin MreB to regulate cell shape

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RodZ modulates geometric localization of the bacterial actin MreB to regulate cell shape
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03633-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Colavin, Handuo Shi, Kerwyn Casey Huang

Abstract

In the rod-shaped bacterium Escherichia coli, the actin-like protein MreB localizes in a curvature-dependent manner and spatially coordinates cell-wall insertion to maintain cell shape, although the molecular mechanism by which cell width is regulated remains unknown. Here we demonstrate that the membrane protein RodZ regulates the biophysical properties of MreB and alters the spatial organization of E. coli cell-wall growth. The relative expression levels of MreB and RodZ change in a manner commensurate with variations in growth rate and cell width, and RodZ systematically alters the curvature-based localization of MreB and cell width in a concentration-dependent manner. We identify MreB mutants that alter the bending properties of MreB filaments in molecular dynamics simulations similar to RodZ binding, and show that these mutants rescue rod-like shape in the absence of RodZ alone or in combination with wild-type MreB. Thus, E. coli can control its shape and dimensions by differentially regulating RodZ and MreB to alter the patterning of cell-wall insertion, highlighting the rich regulatory landscape of cytoskeletal molecular biophysics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 27%
Chemistry 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,135,879
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#41,973
of 57,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,906
of 344,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#920
of 1,178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.