↓ Skip to main content

Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
DOI 10.2147/opth.s14521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Romero-Aroca, Ramon Sagarra-Alamo, Josep Basora-Gallisa, Teresa Basora-Gallisa, Marc Baget-Bernaldiz, Angel Bautista-Perez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 22 29%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#822
of 3,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,675
of 190,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.