↓ Skip to main content

Early diversification of birds: Evidence from a new opposite bird

Overview of attention for article published in Science Bulletin, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early diversification of birds: Evidence from a new opposite bird
Published in
Science Bulletin, June 2001
DOI 10.1007/bf02900473
Authors

Fucheng Zhang, Zhonghe Zhou, Lianhai Hou, Gang Gu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 54 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 56%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Science Bulletin
#698
of 1,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,149
of 41,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Bulletin
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.