↓ Skip to main content

Evaporation dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaporation dynamics
Published in
Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, May 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02755968
Authors

V. V. Dil’man, V. A. Lotkhov, N. N. Kulov, V. I. Naidenov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Energy 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2008.
All research outputs
#7,454,066
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering
#10
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,738
of 39,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them