↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter Intestinal Current Measurements in Rectal Biopsies from CF and Non-CF Subjects to Monitor CFTR Function

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicenter Intestinal Current Measurements in Rectal Biopsies from CF and Non-CF Subjects to Monitor CFTR Function
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0073905
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P. Clancy, Rhonda D. Szczesniak, Melissa A. Ashlock, Sarah E. Ernst, Lijuan Fan, Douglas B. Hornick, Philip H. Karp, Umer Khan, James Lymp, Alicia J. Ostmann, Amir Rezayat, Timothy D. Starner, Shajan P. Sugandha, Hongtao Sun, Nancy Quinney, Scott H. Donaldson, Steven M. Rowe, Sherif E. Gabriel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
India 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,549,344
of 23,031,582 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,374
of 196,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,073
of 199,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,071
of 4,983 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,031,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,983 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.