↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-6750-5-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frédéric R Raymond, Hoang-Anh Ho, Régis Peytavi, Luc Bissonnette, Maurice Boissinot, François J Picard, Mario Leclerc, Michel G Bergeron

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 35%
Researcher 12 28%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Engineering 6 14%
Materials Science 5 12%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,150,065
of 12,373,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#171
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,512
of 272,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them