↓ Skip to main content

Clinical presentation of qualitative olfactory dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical presentation of qualitative olfactory dysfunction
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00405-003-0703-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Frasnelli, B. N. Landis, S. Heilmann, B. Hauswald, K. B. Hüttenbrink, J. S. Lacroix, D. A. Leopold, T. Hummel

Abstract

Many patients with olfactory dysfunction not only experience quantitative reduction of olfactory function, but also suffer from distorted olfactory sensations. This qualitative dysfunction is referred to as parosmia (also called "troposmia") or phantosmia, with the major difference that distorted olfactory sensations are experienced in the presence or absence of an odor, respectively. Our clinical observations corroborate the literature in terms of a general underestimation of the incidence of olfactory distortions. Based on selected cases we try to show that olfactory distortions exhibit a large variance in their clinical appearance. Further, emphasis is placed on the fact that only a detailed and directed history of the patient can provide cues to the correct diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 21 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Psychology 11 16%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,084,675
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#400
of 3,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,427
of 53,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them