You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of hierarchical cluster analysis methods by cophenetic correlation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1029-242x-2013-203 |
| Authors |
Sinan Saraçli, Nurhan Doğan, İsmet Doğan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 354 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 33 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 111 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 17% |
| Engineering | 39 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 81 | 22% |
| Unknown | 122 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#7
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,256
of 211,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.