You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of a Novel ZIC3 Isoform and Mutation Screening in Patients with Heterotaxy and Congenital Heart Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0023755 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James E. J. Bedard, Allison M. Haaning, Stephanie M. Ware |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 24% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,487
of 196,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,279
of 124,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#984
of 2,391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.