↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Novel Pathogenicity Loci in Clostridium perfringens Strains That Cause Avian Necrotic Enteritis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Novel Pathogenicity Loci in Clostridium perfringens Strains That Cause Avian Necrotic Enteritis
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dion Lepp, Bryan Roxas, Valeria R. Parreira, Pradeep R. Marri, Everett L. Rosey, Joshua Gong, J. Glenn Songer, Gayatri Vedantam, John F. Prescott

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 96 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,370,560
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,363
of 199,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,922
of 96,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#171
of 695 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 695 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.