↓ Skip to main content

Heterosubtypic Protection against Pathogenic Human and Avian Influenza Viruses via In Vivo Electroporation of Synthetic Consensus DNA Antigens

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
38 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heterosubtypic Protection against Pathogenic Human and Avian Influenza Viruses via In Vivo Electroporation of Synthetic Consensus DNA Antigens
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominick J. Laddy, Jian Yan, Michele Kutzler, Darwyn Kobasa, Gary P. Kobinger, Amir S. Khan, Jack Greenhouse, Niranjan Y. Sardesai, Ruxandra Draghia-Akli, David B. Weiner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,711
of 196,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,898
of 82,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#186
of 460 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 460 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.