↓ Skip to main content

Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds Accelerate Wound Healing

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofiber Scaffolds Accelerate Wound Healing
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurore Schneider, Jonathan A. Garlick, Christophe Egles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 189 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 26%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 16%
Chemistry 26 13%
Engineering 25 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 12%
Materials Science 14 7%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,759,175
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,711
of 196,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,375
of 157,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#96
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.