↓ Skip to main content

A Metagenomic Analysis of Pandemic Influenza A (2009 H1N1) Infection in Patients from North America

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Metagenomic Analysis of Pandemic Influenza A (2009 H1N1) Infection in Patients from North America
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013381
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander L. Greninger, Eunice C. Chen, Taylor Sittler, Alex Scheinerman, Nareg Roubinian, Guixia Yu, Edward Kim, Dylan R. Pillai, Cyril Guyard, Tony Mazzulli, Pavel Isa, Carlos F. Arias, John Hackett, Gerald Schochetman, Steve Miller, Patrick Tang, Charles Y. Chiu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 254 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 20%
Student > Master 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 33 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 3%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 36 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,550,194
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,487
of 196,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,582
of 99,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#522
of 934 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 934 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.