↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of Immune Cell Densities in Immune Cell Conglomerates: An Approach for High-Throughput Quantification

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimation of Immune Cell Densities in Immune Cell Conglomerates: An Approach for High-Throughput Quantification
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels Halama, Inka Zoernig, Anna Spille, Kathi Westphal, Peter Schirmacher, Dirk Jaeger, Niels Grabe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 57 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 26%
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Computer Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#4,759,510
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,711
of 196,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,032
of 79,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#176
of 542 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 542 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.