↓ Skip to main content

Direct Nitrate Reductase Assay versus Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility Test for Rapid Detection of MDR-TB in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct Nitrate Reductase Assay versus Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility Test for Rapid Detection of MDR-TB in Uganda
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019565
Pubmed ID
Authors

Freddie Bwanga, Melle Haile, Moses L. Joloba, Emmanuel Ochom, Sven Hoffner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Nigeria 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,550,598
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,488
of 196,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,866
of 110,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#786
of 1,636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.