↓ Skip to main content

Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
576 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
655 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming
Published in
Nature, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0005-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuel J. Steinbauer, John-Arvid Grytnes, Gerald Jurasinski, Aino Kulonen, Jonathan Lenoir, Harald Pauli, Christian Rixen, Manuela Winkler, Manfred Bardy-Durchhalter, Elena Barni, Anne D. Bjorkman, Frank T. Breiner, Sarah Burg, Patryk Czortek, Melissa A. Dawes, Anna Delimat, Stefan Dullinger, Brigitta Erschbamer, Vivian A. Felde, Olatz Fernández-Arberas, Kjetil F. Fossheim, Daniel Gómez-García, Damien Georges, Erlend T. Grindrud, Sylvia Haider, Siri V. Haugum, Hanne Henriksen, María J. Herreros, Bogdan Jaroszewicz, Francesca Jaroszynska, Robert Kanka, Jutta Kapfer, Kari Klanderud, Ingolf Kühn, Andrea Lamprecht, Magali Matteodo, Umberto Morra di Cella, Signe Normand, Arvid Odland, Siri L. Olsen, Sara Palacio, Martina Petey, Veronika Piscová, Blazena Sedlakova, Klaus Steinbauer, Veronika Stöckli, Jens-Christian Svenning, Guido Teppa, Jean-Paul Theurillat, Pascal Vittoz, Sarah J. Woodin, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Sonja Wipf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 293 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 655 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 655 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 113 17%
Researcher 108 16%
Student > Master 82 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 4%
Other 99 15%
Unknown 182 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 204 31%
Environmental Science 143 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 2%
Engineering 10 2%
Other 37 6%
Unknown 213 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 573. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#42,134
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,618
of 98,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#940
of 345,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#91
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.