↓ Skip to main content

Local knowledge and practices towards malaria in an irrigated farming community in Ghana

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local knowledge and practices towards malaria in an irrigated farming community in Ghana
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12936-018-2291-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hector Attu, Jones K. Adjei

Abstract

Although malaria is endemic across Ghana, the risk is generally elevated for residents living in and around stagnant water bodies such as dams and irrigated farming projects. What knowledge do these at-risk populations have about the aetiology and symptoms of malaria? What are their coping strategies? And what interventions are needed to help improve the health outcomes of people living in high-risk malaria communities? This study addressed these research questions with primary data, comprising both qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys, collected in Asutsuare-a rural irrigated farming community located in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Results from the fieldwork showed that awareness of malaria as a major health concern in the community was universal. Respondents also displayed a high knowledge of some common clinical symptoms of malaria. Yet, only 3% out of the total survey respondents of 337 indicated they immediately visit a health facility for treatment whenever they suspected malaria. The overwhelming majority (about 97%) indicated they only visit a healthcare facility for treatment if they felt the suspected malaria illness was severe and/or other treatment options had failed. Malaria testing training for drug dispensing personnel as well as the provision of malaria testing kits in drug dispensing stores are necessary to facilitate early malaria screening and timely diagnosis particularly in rural endemic areas.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Lecturer 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 11 27%
Unknown 7 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,248,437
of 15,622,089 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,446
of 4,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,419
of 280,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,622,089 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them