You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Degenerate T-cell Recognition of Peptides on MHC Molecules Creates Large Holes in the T-cell Repertoire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002412 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jorg J. A. Calis, Rob J. de Boer, Can Keşmir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 26% |
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,699,173
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,681
of 9,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,195
of 168,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#54
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.