You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Engineering a Disulfide Bond in the Lid Hinge Region of Rhizopus chinensis Lipase: Increased Thermostability and Altered Acyl Chain Length Specificity
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0046388 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiao-Wei Yu, Nian-Jiang Tan, Rong Xiao, Yan Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 28% |
Chemistry | 12 | 14% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,550,598
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,490
of 196,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,141
of 173,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,720
of 4,547 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,547 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.