You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Design and Analysis of Rhesus Cytomegalovirus IL-10 Mutants as a Model for Novel Vaccines against Human Cytomegalovirus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0028127 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naomi J. Logsdon, Meghan K. Eberhardt, Christopher E. Allen, Peter A. Barry, Mark R. Walter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,760,027
of 23,035,022 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,713
of 196,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,344
of 240,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#610
of 2,680 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,035,022 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,680 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.