You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of a Common Lupus Disease-Associated microRNA Expression Pattern in Three Different Murine Models of Lupus
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014302 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rujuan Dai, Yan Zhang, Deena Khan, Bettina Heid, David Caudell, Oswald Crasta, S. Ansar Ahmed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 28% |
Researcher | 20 | 24% |
Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 7 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 39% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,597,298
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,188
of 210,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,534
of 188,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#248
of 1,031 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,031 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.