↓ Skip to main content

Scoping review of patient- and family-oriented outcomes and measures for chronic pediatric disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scoping review of patient- and family-oriented outcomes and measures for chronic pediatric disease
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12887-015-0323-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara D Khangura, Maria D Karaceper, Yannis Trakadis, John J Mitchell, Pranesh Chakraborty, Kylie Tingley, Doug Coyle, Scott D Grosse, Jonathan B Kronick, Anne-Marie Laberge, Julian Little, Chitra Prasad, Lindsey Sikora, Komudi Siriwardena, Rebecca Sparkes, Kathy N Speechley, Sylvia Stockler, Brenda J Wilson, Kumanan Wilson, Reem Zayed, Beth K Potter

Abstract

Improvements in health care for children with chronic diseases must be informed by research that emphasizes outcomes of importance to patients and families. To support a program of research in the field of rare inborn errors of metabolism (IEM), we conducted a broad scoping review of primary studies that: (i) focused on chronic pediatric diseases similar to IEM in etiology or manifestations and in complexity of management; (ii) reported patient- and/or family-oriented outcomes; and (iii) measured these outcomes using self-administered tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 12 8%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 49 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,869,624
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,289
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,579
of 366,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.