↓ Skip to main content

Distinct Differences in the Expansion and Phenotype of TB10.4 Specific CD8 and CD4 T Cells after Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct Differences in the Expansion and Phenotype of TB10.4 Specific CD8 and CD4 T Cells after Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Truc Thi Kim Thanh Hoang, Anneline Nansen, Sugata Roy, Rolf Billeskov, Claus Aagaard, Tara Elvang, Jes Dietrich, Peter Andersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Canada 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 31 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 34%
Researcher 8 23%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,760,027
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,714
of 196,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,135
of 99,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#178
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.