You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeting Angiogenesis-Dependent Calcified Neoplasms Using Combined Polymer Therapeutics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0005233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ehud Segal, Huaizhong Pan, Paula Ofek, Taturo Udagawa, Pavla Kopečková, Jindřich Kopeček, Ronit Satchi-Fainaro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Professor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,760,027
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,714
of 196,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,163
of 93,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#190
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.