↓ Skip to main content

Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 66,955)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4587 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean
Published in
Science, February 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.1260352
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. R. Jambeck, R. Geyer, C. Wilcox, T. R. Siegler, M. Perryman, A. Andrady, R. Narayan, K. L. Law

Abstract

Plastic debris in the marine environment is widely documented, but the quantity of plastic entering the ocean from waste generated on land is unknown. By linking worldwide data on solid waste, population density, and economic status, we estimated the mass of land-based plastic waste entering the ocean. We calculate that 275 million metric tons (MT) of plastic waste was generated in 192 coastal countries in 2010, with 4.8 to 12.7 million MT entering the ocean. Population size and the quality of waste management systems largely determine which countries contribute the greatest mass of uncaptured waste available to become plastic marine debris. Without waste management infrastructure improvements, the cumulative quantity of plastic waste available to enter the ocean from land is predicted to increase by an order of magnitude by 2025.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,262 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 <1%
Brazil 8 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 19 <1%
Unknown 4523 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1113 24%
Student > Master 959 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 574 13%
Researcher 476 10%
Other 159 3%
Other 596 13%
Unknown 710 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1003 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 665 14%
Engineering 440 10%
Chemistry 295 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 217 5%
Other 1041 23%
Unknown 926 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5559. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#197
of 15,576,492 outputs
Outputs from Science
#17
of 66,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 290,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 1,217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,576,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.