↓ Skip to main content

SystemQ: Bridging the gap between queuing-based performance evaluation and SystemC

Overview of attention for article published in Design Automation for Embedded Systems, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SystemQ: Bridging the gap between queuing-based performance evaluation and SystemC
Published in
Design Automation for Embedded Systems, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10617-006-9002-3
Authors

Sören Sonntag, Matthias Gries, Christian Sauer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,551,483
of 23,036,991 outputs
Outputs from Design Automation for Embedded Systems
#9
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,940
of 69,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Design Automation for Embedded Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,036,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them