↓ Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Resource of Interacting Protein Regions for Refining Human Transcription Factor Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Comprehensive Resource of Interacting Protein Regions for Refining Human Transcription Factor Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etsuko Miyamoto-Sato, Shigeo Fujimori, Masamichi Ishizaka, Naoya Hirai, Kazuyo Masuoka, Rintaro Saito, Yosuke Ozawa, Katsuya Hino, Takanori Washio, Masaru Tomita, Tatsuhiro Yamashita, Tomohiro Oshikubo, Hidetoshi Akasaka, Jun Sugiyama, Yasuo Matsumoto, Hiroshi Yanagawa

Abstract

Large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are a valuable resource for mapping and analysis of the topological and dynamic features of interactome networks. The currently available large-scale PPI data sets only contain information on interaction partners. The data presented in this study also include the sequences involved in the interactions (i.e., the interacting regions, IRs) suggested to correspond to functional and structural domains. Here we present the first large-scale IR data set obtained using mRNA display for 50 human transcription factors (TFs), including 12 transcription-related proteins. The core data set (966 IRs; 943 PPIs) displays a verification rate of 70%. Analysis of the IR data set revealed the existence of IRs that interact with multiple partners. Furthermore, these IRs were preferentially associated with intrinsic disorder. This finding supports the hypothesis that intrinsically disordered regions play a major role in the dynamics and diversity of TF networks through their ability to structurally adapt to and bind with multiple partners. Accordingly, this domain-based interaction resource represents an important step in refining protein interactions and networks at the domain level and in associating network analysis with biological structure and function.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Hong Kong 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 73 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 22%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,765
of 194,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,663
of 93,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#352
of 665 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 665 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.